660801Meteor1_p1

Click on the thumbnail at the bottom right of this page to go to the bitmap scan of this document. The text of this document appears immediately below.

                      THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF CANADA

                                   METEOR SECTION


PRELIMINARY NEWS-LETTER                                               1 August, 1966


I'd better start this news-letter off by apologizing to all active and potential
meteor observers in general, and to kiss Isabel K. Wifliamson, the National
Chairman of the Standing Committee on Observational Activities in particular,
for the embarrassed silence of this Section since I was appointed Co-ordinator.

Meteor observing is a field in which amateurs without specialized equipment can
make an important contribution and enjoy themselves at the same time The
prime requirements are enthusiaem, familiarity with the constellations, and a
willingness to stay up when the majority of citizens have hit the sack. All
other things being equal, more meteors are seen between midnight and dawn than
between dusk and midnight. After all, those arriving before midnight have to
overtake the Zerth from the rear, while those we see in the wee small hotus are
meeting us head-on. Thus the latter will, tend to be brighter, and there will be
more of them.

This is a field, also, in which the younger member can come into his (or her!) own.
Here in Ottawa, we have two groups of experienced observers (Hillcrest and Queensway)
made up of high school students. So, if you are thinking of starting or expanding
a meteor observing group, don't neglect people of high school age as a source of
recruits after a short period of training, they can develop into very effective
observers.

It is my intention to have the first few bulletins deal with such topics as setting
up a visual observing station, the type of information to be gathered by visual
observers, and the recovery of meteorites after a suspected fall. Later bulletins
will deal with meteor photography and spectroscopy, telescopic meteors, and the
collection of fireball reports from untrained observers. I would like to stress
that these bulletins will be in the nature of advice from one amateur to another,
and will not be laying down hard and fast rules. If you have any ideas of your
own, go ahead and try them out, and please let me know the results. I would
like to have your comments on the bulletins and news-letters (including this one!),
and also news of your group or Centre's activities in the meteor observing field.
(But not the data you've collected, please send that to the Meteor Centre,
National Research Council, Ottawa 2, Ontario, where Dr. Peter U. Millman will feed
it to his hungry computors).

There have bean a number of brilliant fireballs seen lately, and it is important
to remember that most of the people from whom observations of this class of object
can be collected do not know what it is they hate seen. Reports ot flying saucers,
or unconfirmed stories of planes crashing in flames, unexplained noises from the
sky, and other peculiar happenings, should be investigated otherwise the chance
of a meteorite recovery may be lost. Remember, reporters and others who work in
the mass-communication field cannot be expected to be familiar with meteoritic
phenomena. In this connection, it's instructive to read the reports of the 
meteorite which fell in Barwell, England, last Christmas Eve (see Sky and Telescope,
July 1966, page 7, and Journal of the British Astronomical Association, April 1966,
page 192), and compare it with the recoveries of the Bruderheim meteorite of
4 March 1960 and the Peace River meteorite of 31 March 1963 (see Journal of the
Royal Astronomical Society of Canada: October 1961, page 218; and June 1964,
page 109, respectively), I personally think the comparison reflects great credit
on our Western meteorite reeovery experts.

                                                                        ... 2